Revisión de pares

Peer Review Process

The journal ensures the academic quality of all manuscripts through a rigorous and transparent peer review process, aligned with internationally recognized best practices in scientific publishing.

All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial screening by the editorial team, which verifies compliance with submission guidelines, thematic relevance, and the overall originality of the manuscript.

Manuscripts that pass this stage are subject to an anonymous peer review process (double-blind peer review), in which both authors and reviewers remain unaware of each other’s identities, in order to ensure impartiality and prevent conflicts of interest.

Each manuscript is evaluated by at least two external reviewers, specialists in the corresponding thematic area. Reviewers assess the theoretical and methodological quality, contribution to the field, clarity of presentation, ethical integrity, and overall coherence of the text.

Editorial decisions may be:

• Accept

• Accept with minor revisions

• Request major revisions and resubmission

• Reject

In cases of conflicting reports, the editorial committee may request an additional review by a third evaluator. All final decisions are made by the responsible editorial team, taking into account the reviewers’ reports and the journal’s editorial policies.